Nearly one in five private homes resold in Singapore’s prime districts in the third quarter of 2026 changed hands for less than the seller paid. Cushman and Wakefield, compiling matched caveats for The Business Times, counted 2,021 resales in the quarter by owners who had bought within the previous ten years, and 93 of them lost money: 4.6% islandwide, up from 3.7% in the second quarter and 3.3% a year earlier, and the highest share since 6.9% in the second quarter of 2022. The Core Central Region supplied half of those losses, with 19.5% of its resales in the red. The same quarter’s URA index rose 1.4%. Those two facts do not contradict each other. They describe a market where the average keeps climbing and a specific kind of unit, bought a specific way, keeps falling, and the Q3 tables are unusually clear about which kind.

Source: Cushman and Wakefield Research for The Business Times, matched URA caveats downloaded 19 October 2026, reported 1 November 2026. Gross figures before stamp duties and costs.

4.6%
of Q3 2026 resales sold at a loss
93 of 2,021 matched deals · highest since Q2 2022
19.5%
of Core Central Region resales lost money
CCR supplied 49% of all loss-making deals
24.8%
median gain on the profitable deals
Down from a 30.4% peak in Q2 2025
163.9%
biggest gain, an EC at Hundred Palms
$860,000 in 2017, $2.26 million in 2026

How many sellers lost money in Q3 2026?

Roughly one in 22 across the island, and the gradient by region is the story. In the Core Central Region, 19.5% of matched resales closed at a loss, up from 17.7% in the second quarter, and the region accounted for 49% of every loss-making deal in the country. In the Rest of Central Region the share was 4.5%, up from 2.7%, and 30% of the losses. In the Outside Central Region it was 1.6%, up from 1.3%, and 20% of the losses. The other side of the ledger is thinning too: the median gain among profitable resales and sub-sales fell to 24.8%, from a peak of 30.4% in the second quarter of 2025. Wong Xian Yang, the firm’s head of research for Singapore and South-east Asia, put it plainly: with prices at historical highs and the macro picture uncertain, buyers are getting selective and resale outcomes will vary more widely from project to project.

Loss-making resales by region, Q3 2026

Cushman and Wakefield for The Business Times, 1 November 2026. Matched caveats for private homes with a prior purchase within the preceding ten years.

RegionShare of resales at a loss, Q3Q2 2026Share of all loss-making deals
Core Central Region19.5%17.7%49%
Rest of Central Region4.5%2.7%30%
Outside Central Region1.6%1.3%20%
Islandwide4.6%3.7%100%

The firm restated its series in November. Its August report had put the second quarter at 4.7% and the 2022 peak at 5.3%; the November series puts them at 3.7% and 6.9%, and counts only units with a prior purchase in the preceding ten years. Both series agree on the direction.

Which condos lost the most money?

The five biggest losses by percentage and the five biggest by dollar amount were all 99-year leasehold units in the Core Central Region: four at Marina One Residences and one at V on Shenton in the Marina Bay and Shenton Way pocket, three at OUE Twin Peaks on Leonie Hill Road in District 9, and one at Cape Royale on Sentosa Cove. The steepest was a 710 sq ft unit at Marina One Residences, bought in July 2018 for $1.83 million and sold in August 2026 for $1.25 million: a 32% loss, or 4.6% a year over 8.1 years. The largest in dollars was a 1,604 sq ft unit at OUE Twin Peaks, bought in March 2017 for $4.9 million and sold in August for $3.88 million, a loss of about $1 million, or 2.4% a year over 9.4 years.

The biggest loss-making resales, Q3 2026

Cushman and Wakefield for The Business Times, 1 November 2026. Non-landed, matched caveats, gross of stamp duties and costs. Prices as reported, rounded to $0.1 million.

ProjectSoldBoughtLoss
Marina One Residences · 99-year · CCR$1.3m$1.8m31.6%
OUE Twin Peaks · 99-year · CCR$1.1m$1.5m27.2%
Marina One Residences · 99-year · CCR$1.3m$1.8m25.8%
Marina One Residences · 99-year · CCR$1.3m$1.6m24.2%
OUE Twin Peaks · 99-year · CCR$1.1m$1.4m24.0%
OUE Twin Peaks · 99-year · CCR$3.9m$4.9m$1.0m (20.2%)
V on Shenton · 99-year · CCR$3.1m$3.9m$0.7m (18.8%)
Marina One Residences · 99-year · CCR$2.4m$3.1m$0.7m (21.4%)
Cape Royale · 99-year · CCR$3.2m$3.7m$0.5m (13.8%)

The first five rows are the largest losses by percentage; the last four complete the largest by dollar amount. Cape Royale is on Sentosa Cove, which URA counts within the Core Central Region.

Look at what the losers have in common and the list stops looking like bad luck. All are 99-year leasehold. All sit in the prime-district pockets most dependent on foreign and investor buyers: Marina Bay and Shenton Way, the Leonie Hill stretch of District 9, and Sentosa Cove, and foreigners have paid 60% ABSD since April 2023. The two deals The Business Times dates were bought at the top of the previous prime-district cycle, in March 2017 and July 2018, and held 9.4 and 8.1 years, long enough for slides of 2.4% and 4.6% a year to compound into losses of a fifth and nearly a third of the price. The other seven carry no published purchase dates, and the Cape Royale loss cannot fit the same pattern: its developer only began selling units in 2022, so that seller was out within four years. Several are small: the worst deal in the country was a 710 sq ft one-bedder, the format our September piece on The Scotts Tower found at the bottom of the Q2 table too. And the region around them is still soft: URA’s third-quarter data had Core Central Region prices up 0.3% against 2.3% in the Outside Central Region, with CCR vacancy at 8.4%, the highest of the three regions, which is the backdrop the Orchard Boulevard tender was bid into.

Who made money, and what did they buy?

Owners who bought freehold, or bought an executive condominium, and in every deal The Business Times dates, held nine to ten years. The five biggest percentage gains in the quarter all came from Hundred Palms Residences, the EC in Yio Chu Kang, with returns of 138.9% to 163.9% over roughly nine-year holds. The best of them was a 1,055 sq ft unit bought in July 2017 for $860,000 and sold in September for $2.26 million, an 11.2% annualised return over 9.2 years. Strip out the ECs and the five best percentage gains were 83.9% to 88.1%, four of them freehold, led by a 1,410 sq ft unit at The Sea View in the Rest of Central Region: $2.18 million in October 2016, $4.1 million in September 2026, 6.5% a year. By dollar amount, the biggest winner was a 4,704 sq ft Leedon Residence unit sold in July for $14.3 million against a 2017 purchase at $10.55 million, a $3.75 million gain, and all five of the largest dollar gains were in freehold developments. Three of those five were in the Core Central Region.

The biggest profitable resales, Q3 2026

Cushman and Wakefield for The Business Times, 1 November 2026. Non-landed, matched caveats, gross of stamp duties and costs.

ProjectSoldBoughtGain
Hundred Palms Residences · EC · OCR$2.3m$0.9m163.9%
The Sea View · freehold · RCR$4.1m$2.2m88.1%
The Windsor · freehold · OCR$2.8m$1.5m85.3%
Thomson 800 · freehold · CCR$3.3m$1.8m84.4%
Hillview Green · 999-year · OCR$2.2m$1.2m84.0%
Park Natura · freehold · OCR$4.2m$2.3m83.9%
Leedon Residence · freehold · CCR$14.3m$10.6m$3.8m (35.5%)
Grange Residences · freehold · CCR$10.8m$8.0m$2.8m (35.0%)
Rivergate · freehold · CCR$6.4m$4.0m$2.3m (57.8%)

The first row is the top EC gain, the next five are the top gains excluding ECs, and the last three are the largest gains by dollar amount. The Business Times reports four of the five top non-EC percentage gains as freehold; tenure labels here follow that report and public project records.

The contrast is not the Core Central Region against the Outside Central Region. Three of the five largest dollar gains were prime-district homes, and Leedon Residence sits in District 10, as prime an address as any on the loss list. The contrast is tenure, size and the buyer the unit was built for. A freehold family-sized unit in a district with owner-occupier depth found a buyer at a profit after nine years. A 99-year investor-format unit in a precinct that lives on foreign demand did not. That was the finding in the Q2 table too, and it is the same test we put to every project that scores well on paper: not what the unit is worth today, but who is standing on the other side of the deal when you need to sell.

What should prime-district owners and buyers do with this?

Run the exit test on your unit →

Sources

Found this useful? Share it
Link copied ✓

Holding a prime-district 99-year unit bought near the 2017 to 2018 peak, or tempted by one at today’s discount? We run the exit on your actual stack, size and facing before you decide either way.

Book a consult →Free BuySafe read →

How these numbers are made. Loss and gain figures are gross, from matched URA caveats compiled by Cushman and Wakefield for The Business Times: a Q3 2026 resale set against the same unit’s purchase within the preceding ten years, before stamp duties, interest, rental income, maintenance and commissions, so a seller’s true cash outcome can be better or worse than the headline. The firm restated its series in November 2026, and the second-quarter and 2022 comparisons here use the November figures. Per-square-foot figures for the Marina One unit are our arithmetic on the reported prices and floor area. Tenure labels follow The Business Times and public project records. The header image is an AI-generated illustration of the Marina Bay skyline, not a photograph. Not financial advice: this is general market commentary, not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold.

← All insights